Architecture & Unbuilt Legacy

How do architects view their legacy and might it be necessary to reframe the current thinking?

When architects talk about unbuilt work they mean buildings.

What if they were to reframe that thinking?

What if an architect’s legacy was more than their buildings? An unbuilt legacy if you like.

I’m curious about such a question, because I think it has the power to change the way architects think about practice and their work. If an architect’s sole focus wasn’t just on a legacy of the buildings they design would they change the way they practiced? Here’s what they might change and indeed what some architects are already doing…

Developing better architecture business and culture through being better employers and employees (in some cases). This is a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion, of teaching and learning, good work hours, reasonable if not good pay, sharing, development and growth (professional and personal) and showing generous leadership in doing so. This work includes not undercutting others in the profession though poor fees, commentary or posture.

Shepherding and championing a better attitude to our city, urban design, public interests and the environment. Actively working on the political or administrative side in leadership, not just on the design side.

Unselfishly leading in a way that leads to a better profession, a better built environment and public benefit. Leadership can at times come from a position that is self-serving, driving change for the good of a few (or perhaps just the profession). That is not good or unselfish leadership. It’s worth noting too, that good leadership doesn’t always come from the top, it can come at all levels.

Doing work for good that makes the entire profession proud. Not because it is an architectural masterwork, but because it is serving a cause for good that is greater than the profession. Not necessarily in public but for a community. This work is typically not publishable nor does it draw attention to itself – it’s not likely to be, for example, another kit of parts emergency shelter or low cost house.

For architects to consider their legacy requires a consideration of their work in a broader context. It must be more than a consideration of delivering a building and maintaining an office in order to do so. It’s really about Architects leading and changing people for the better, not just the environment they are tasked with.

My challenge to all architects is to consider the question…

What is the legacy you want to leave?

Picture by Lindeboom Jean-Bapt on Pexels

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Tickle your fancy?

Recent Posts

skater dude practising his moves in the bowl

More Practise, Make Better

Learning on the job only goes so far. A better architecture practice takes practise. Architects should actively practise the skills they have and develop their human skills.

Architecture, Awards and Stories

Architecture awards are an important part of the culture and it’s therefore important to consider what they’re for and who they’re for.

The latest from the mind of Michael

Blog Me Please

Get notified about new articles