Architecture & Unbuilt Legacy

How do architects view their legacy and might it be necessary to reframe the current thinking?

When architects talk about unbuilt work they mean building designs.

What if they were to reframe that thinking?

What if an architect’s legacy was more than their buildings? An unbuilt legacy if you like.

I’m curious about such a question, because I think it has the power to change the way architects think about practice and their work. If an architect’s sole focus wasn’t just on a legacy of the buildings they design would they change the way they practiced? Here’s what they might change and indeed what some architects are already doing…

Developing better architecture business and culture through being better employers and employees. This is a culture of diversity, equity and inclusion, of teaching and learning, good work hours, reasonable if not good pay, sharing, development and growth (professional and personal), and showing generous leadership in doing so. This work includes not undercutting others in the profession though poor fees, commentary or posture.

Shepherding and championing a better attitude to our city, urban design, public interests and the environment. Actively working and leading on the political or administrative side of practice, not just on the design side.

Unselfishly leading in a way that leads to a better profession, a better built environment and public benefit. Leadership can at times come from a position that is self-serving, driving change for the good of a few (or perhaps just the profession). That is not good or unselfish leadership. It’s worth noting too, that good leadership doesn’t always come from the top, it happens at all levels.

Doing work for good that makes the entire profession proud. Not because it is an architectural masterwork, but because it is serving a cause for good that is greater than the profession. Not necessarily in public but for a community. This work is typically not publishable nor draw attention to itself – it’s not likely to be, for example, another kit of parts emergency shelter or low cost house for publication.

For architects to consider their legacy requires a consideration of their work in a broader context. It must be more than a consideration of delivering a building, and maintaining an office in order to do so. It’s really about Architects leading and changing people for the better, not just the immediate environment they are tasked with.

My challenge to all architects is to consider the question…

What is the legacy you want to leave?

Picture by Lindeboom Jean-Bapt on Pexels

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Tickle your fancy?

Recent Posts

Architects vulnerably leading change

In order to make change happen sometimes, instead of driving it, we simply need to be vulnerable, modelling it for others to follow. This is the action of a leader.

On the right words

No matter what anyone tells you, book covers and first impressions matter. We can nevertheless reframe their importance.

Architects rethinking their identity

Our identities are often tied up with our way of thinking. By rethinking our identities we begin to overcome habitual thinking that might be holding us back.

A lack of diversity

Changing Your Architecture Practice

Change can be gradual or sudden. It is inevitable. So there’s a choice for architectural practice, be forced to change by the context in which you practice or choose to change into the practice you’d like to be.

The latest from the mind of Michael

Blog Me Please

Get notified about new articles